Thursday, August 18, 2016

Research on mental imagery and tests presumably requiring the use of it



This is post no.2 on mental imagery.  Post no. 1 is here.

Mental imagery seems like a completely subjective phenomenon.  Can its existence be proven or at least can its influences be objectively studied?  Maybe so!

Research findings on auditory imagery

Participants were presented with the beginning of a familiar tune (the researchers used wordless movie themes or classical music).  They were asked to "play" the rest of the tune in their mind up to a specific point in it.  When they reached that point, they pushed a button.  The time lapse until the button was pushed was proportional to the duration of the segment the participants were asked to complete!

The time needed to say the ABC twice and to mentally say the ABC twice is identical.
Participants were asked to say specific words and to imagine they are saying other words.  Later they could hardly distinguish between the words they said and the words they imagined they said.

When adults were awakened from REM sleep, 13% of them reported having a nonverbal auditory image in their dream, and 94% reported they talked or had conversations in their dreams.

Research findings on visual imagery

Mental rotation is the ability to mentally rotate representations of two and three dimensional objects.  This ability helps us recognize objects that we see.  As we saw in the previous post, in tasks like the one in the picture below, a person is asked to decide which of the four stimuli on the right is identical with the stimulus on the left.  People usually solve this task by mental rotation – mentally rotating the stimuli on the right until they are parallel (or not) with the stimulus on the left.





Shepard and Metzler (1971), who were pioneers in this field of research, discovered that the time needed to decide whether a rotated stimulus is identical with a given stimulus is proportional to the degree of rotation!  This means that we rotate the object in our mind's eye in a steady pace.  Men are slightly better on this task than women.   This ability is found in five months old babies.  It peaks in early adulthood and then begins to deteriorate.

Examples of familiar tests in which performance may be aided by mental imagery





In order to solve this matrix, we have to place in our mind's eye the middle stimulus in every row on the left stimulus in that row.  The solution (the right stimulus in each row) is composed of the un-parallel lines in both stimuli.  Thus the answer is no. 8.  When we mentally place image on image and analyze the result we are manipulating mental images.
 
Learning an association between two concepts or a word/concept list – mental imagery can help us learn concept pairs (for instance, if I want to learn the pair "tree" and "cup" I can imagine a tree that grows cups instead of fruit.  The image should be amusing and impossible to be retrieved easily).  Similar techniques help us learn word lists (for instance, we can mentally assign words to places on a list of places on a mental fixed path.  We form visual images linking each word to its place.  When we retrieve the words we "walk" down the mental path and "pick" the word from each pair).

Retrieval of visual stimuli – when we draw a visual stimulus which we saw or copied in the past, we usually form a visual image of the stimulus and "copy" it to the paper.

Phonological segmentation – we can use mental imagery in various phonological tasks.  For instance, in order to choose from the pictures below the two that begin with the same sound, we can say the object names in our mind's ear and analyze the first sound.  This will lead us to choose "cup" and "cane" which both begin with the sound /k/.

Mental images assist in solving these tests, but research reveals that people who report having poor imagery ability can solve these tests with a similar degree of success.  They probably do it in different ways. 

Hubbard, T. L. Auditory Imagery: Empirical Findings. Psychological Bulletin 2010 American Psychological Association 2010, Vol. 136, No. 2, 302–329. http://timothyhubbard.net/hubPB10.pdf

SHEPARD, R. N. & METZLER, J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 1971.701-703

No comments:

Post a Comment