ברוכים הבאים! בלוג זה נועד לספק משאבים לפסיכולוגים חינוכיים ואחרים בנושאים הקשורים לדיאגנוסטיקה באורייטנצית CHC אבל לא רק.

בבלוג יוצגו מאמרים נבחרים וכן מצגות שלי וחומרים נוספים.

אם אתם חדשים כאן, אני ממליצה לכם לעיין בסדרת המצגות המופיעה בטור הימני, שכותרתה "משכל ויכולות קוגניטיביות".

Welcome! This blog is intended to provide assessment resources for Educational and other psychologists.

The material is CHC - oriented , but not entirely so.

The blog features selected papers, presentations made by me and other materials.

If you're new here, I suggest reading the presentation series in the right hand column – "intelligence and cognitive abilities".

נהנית מהבלוג? למה שלא תעקוב/תעקבי אחרי?

Enjoy this blog? Become a follower!

Followers

Search This Blog

Featured Post

קובץ פוסטים על מבחן הוודקוק

      רוצים לדעת יותר על מבחן הוודקוק? לנוחותכם ריכזתי כאן קובץ פוסטים שעוסקים במבחן:   1.      קשרים בין יכולות קוגניטיביות במבחן ה...

Saturday, November 29, 2014

A filmed workshop by Dawn Flanagan!


Dawn Flanagan, one of the leading researchers in CHC theory and application in the world, gave a workshop in the spring of 2013, in the context of the publication of her book  ESSENTIALS OF CROSS BATTERY ASSESSMENT 3RD EDITION.

Part of this workshop appears in six Youtube videos.  Flanagan speaks clearly and the videos are also subtitled.  It's unfortunate that the video sequence is a little cut off.  These videos will not teach you in a comprehensive and systematic way as the book does, but I recommend them if you want to get a general impression.

What does she talk about?

In part 1, she introduces the workshop topics:  revisions to the CHC abilities (these revisions are already included in the presentation series "Intelligence and cognitive abilities"  in the right hand column of this blog), links between assessment and intervention and identifying specific learning disability.

Here is the link to part 1:


In part 2. Flanagan explains in detail the changes to the CHC abilities made by Schneider and McGrew.

Link:



The interesting things in Part 3, in my view, are:

A.    Flanagan talks about comprehension knowledge, how it's measured in intelligence tests and which important aspects of comprehension knowledge are not measured in intelligence tests.
B.   Flanagan says that visual ability tests don't measure visual skills necessary for reading and writing, especially orthographic processing skills.  She gives examples of tests that measure orthographic processing.  The examples are interesting.

Link:



In part 4, Flanagan explains how to do cross battery assessment, and especially how to supplement abilities that are not measured by the main intelligence test used with other intelligence tests.  She explains how the program that her team developed computes ability scores out of test scores that originate from different intelligence tests.

Link:



In part 5, Flanagan mentions the way Dan Miller classifies tests by neuropsychological areas, and how it integrates with the CHC approach.  She also mentions Steve Feifer's work about links between reading difficulties and cognitive abilities.

Link:



In part 6, Flanagan speaks about the way CHC theory made it possible to group the things measured by different intelligence tests into common concepts/abilities, and thus create a common language.  She mentions the development of test interpretation methods through history, and talks about the recent focus on narrow abilities and their connections to reading, writing and math.

Link:



No comments:

Post a Comment