ברוכים הבאים! בלוג זה נועד לספק משאבים לפסיכולוגים חינוכיים ואחרים בנושאים הקשורים לדיאגנוסטיקה באורייטנצית CHC אבל לא רק.

בבלוג יוצגו מאמרים נבחרים וכן מצגות שלי וחומרים נוספים.

אם אתם חדשים כאן, אני ממליצה לכם לעיין בסדרת המצגות המופיעה בטור הימני, שכותרתה "משכל ויכולות קוגניטיביות".

Welcome! This blog is intended to provide assessment resources for Educational and other psychologists.

The material is CHC - oriented , but not entirely so.

The blog features selected papers, presentations made by me and other materials.

If you're new here, I suggest reading the presentation series in the right hand column – "intelligence and cognitive abilities".

נהנית מהבלוג? למה שלא תעקוב/תעקבי אחרי?

Enjoy this blog? Become a follower!

Followers

Search This Blog

Featured Post

קובץ פוסטים על מבחן הוודקוק

      רוצים לדעת יותר על מבחן הוודקוק? לנוחותכם ריכזתי כאן קובץ פוסטים שעוסקים במבחן:   1.      קשרים בין יכולות קוגניטיביות במבחן ה...

Monday, January 5, 2015

Cognitive training can improve fluid ability

 

 

Fluid ability is the ability to tackle new unfamiliar problems, that require making inferences, generalizations, abstract thinking, planning, monitoring and flexible thinking.

 

Who wouldn't like to improve his fluid ability?

 

It might be possible – through practice in n-back tasks.

 

What is an n-back task?

 

It's an apparently simple task:  one is presented with a series of items (pictures, numbers etc.) that are presented sequentially.  The person responds (by pushing a button or verbally) every time that the item presented is identical with the item presented n items ago.  For example, in a 2- back task, the person responds every time the item presented is identical with the item presented 2 items ago.  In a 3- back task, the person responds every time the item presented is identical with the item presented 3 items ago.

This might sound simple, but it's not easy at all (said from a personal experience).  You should try it!   In this site the task is presented as a nice looking game:


As you'll see, practice improves performance in this "game".  You can progress to higher levels: 3-back, 4-back and further.

This task also has a dual version (I would call it an "extreme" version).  In this version, a person has to follow 2 different series of items (one visual and the other auditory) simultaneously, and to respond (by pressing a button) when in each of the series the item presented is identical with the item presented n times ago.

In this research,

The relationship between n-back performance and matrix reasoning — implications for training and transfer
 Susanne M. Jaeggi  , Barbara Studer-Luethi  , Martin Buschkuehl ,Yi-Fen Su John Jonides , Walter J. Perrig  Intelligence (2010)

the researchers tried to find out whether practice in an n-back task affects university student's fluid ability and working memory. Fluid ability was measured by matrices tests, and working memory was assessed by a test that required participants to recall a sequence of stimuli in the correct order in addition to completing a distracting processing task.

Some of the students practiced with an n-back task for a month.  They practiced in their maximal ability level (3-back, 4-back and so on), to make the practice effective.  They practiced 20 minutes per day for four weeks.  Following practice, they all improved on the n-back task.  Some students reached a 7-back level (I think I can only dream about reaching this level)!

Fluid ability and working memory were re-measured following practice.  Performance in the matrices tests improved following n-back practice!  Performance in working memory tests did not improve.

What does the n-back task train?

It might be training memory span.  Memory span is a narrow ability within "short term memory".  Memory span is the ability to maintain items in immediate awareness and to produce them immediately.  "Forward digit span" is a good example of a memory span test.

The n – back, like other memory span tasks, requires maintaining the order of the heard or seen items in immediate awareness. While the item list in other memory tasks is "static", here one has to keep track of information that keeps flowing in throughout task performance, and concurrently keep track of the number of items presented after each item.  This makes the task more complex than other memory span tasks.

This task requires a different kind of manipulation than other working memory tasks (like "backward digit span"). This explains it's relatively low correlation with working memory measures.


What explains the n-back task's influence on fluid ability? It might be the fact that one has to deal quickly with "online" information, compare it with existing information while updating this existing information.  This makes it a task that is related with fluid ability.

No comments:

Post a Comment