ברוכים הבאים! בלוג זה נועד לספק משאבים לפסיכולוגים חינוכיים ואחרים בנושאים הקשורים לדיאגנוסטיקה באורייטנצית CHC אבל לא רק.
בבלוג יוצגו מאמרים נבחרים וכן מצגות שלי וחומרים נוספים.
אם אתם חדשים כאן, אני ממליצה לכם לעיין בסדרת המצגות המופיעה בטור הימני, שכותרתה "משכל ויכולות קוגניטיביות".
Welcome! This blog is intended to provide assessment resources for Educational and other psychologists.
The material is CHC - oriented , but not entirely so.
The blog features selected papers, presentations made by me and other materials.
If you're new here, I suggest reading the presentation series in the right hand column – "intelligence and cognitive abilities".
נהנית מהבלוג? למה שלא תעקוב/תעקבי אחרי?
Enjoy this blog? Become a follower!
Read this blog in English!
Followers
Search This Blog
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Tips for good assessment and report writing - 12
One more tips
written by the assessment team at the Jerusalem
municipality educational psychology services – with some additions by me. The members of the team are: Rita Baumgarten, Hanna Brimer,
Nadine Caplan , Eynat Cohen Rahman , Etti Daniel Simon , Uri Dar ,
Michelle Lisses Topaz, Betty Netzer, Ruth Oman Shaked , Adina Sacknovitz
, Smadar Sapir Yogev, Anan Srour
and Dahlia Zayit.
Conduct a dynamic feedback process and think with the
school team about practical interventions
Feedback is not a
one way stream of information "flowing" from the psychologist to the
parents, the child and the teacher. Feedback
is not the psychologist giving recommendations to the parents, the teachers and
the child. Feedback is a mutual process that
integrates the school staff's, the parent's and the child's views of the
child's situation with the psychologist's thoughts about the sources of the
child's strengths and difficulties. This
integration helps us answer the referral question, and leads to thinking with
the parents, the teacher and the child about interventions worth trying at home
and in school.
The interventions should be in line
with the assessment results. They should
also be practical and specific. That's
why they should be thought about with the parents, the teacher and the
child. When the psychologist, the
teacher, the parents and the child reach a common understanding of the child,
it's possible to think about interventions that utilize the teacher's knowledge
and skills, the parent's knowledge and skills, the child's knowledge and skills
and the psychologist's ideas. The interventions
should address the child's difficulties as well as his strengths (ways to
emphasize them).
Interventions
are part of the assessment process,
since the ways they are implemented provide us with insights about the child, the
school system and the family system. That's
why it's important to set dates for meetings in which tried interventions will
be re-assessed and a richer picture of the child will emerge. This enriched picture will open up new
opportunities of assisting the child. Because of the feedback's mutual
character, it's better to write a final draft of the report after the feedback
meeting. The report will thus
include insights from the meeting and synthesize the stories/theories of the
psychologist, the parents, the teachers and the child.
Give yourselves feedback, too:
think about how the way you conducted the assessment affected the results and
your conclusions. Think about the
decisions you took and when it's needed let your considerations be reflected in
the report.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment